
|
|
|
|
www.niger-meteorite-recon.de
Meteoritica
go to page
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
historic sources for sale

Inventory # C 040
Account Of The Discovery And Bringing Home Of The "Saviksue" or
Great Cape York Meteorites
By Lt. Robert E. Peary, In: Northward over the "Great Ice": A
Narrative of Life and Work along the Shores and upon the Interior
Ice-Cap of Northern Greenland in the Years 1886 and 1891-1897. 2 Volumes. New York 1898
Stunning account on the discovery and salvage of the three Cape
York meteorites by the discoverer himself. Peary explains how almost every
expedition that went north in the area of Melville bay since 1818 tried to
solve the mystery of the "Iron Mountain". Since the iron that was discovered
on Disco Island had prooved to be telluric the scientists doubted a meteoritic origin of
the legendary Iron Mountain that only the Inuit had seen until then.
Peary made several
unseccessful attempts to reach the northern shore of Melville bay until he ans his Eskimo scout
finally reached the location of the meteorites by sledge in May 1894.
In summer 1884 Peary made an attempt with his ship the Falcon to
penetrate the ice of Melville bay and to embark the meteorites. This
operation failed due to an unusual harsh summer in this
region of the arctic circle and he could not get within 30 nautical
miles of his "prizes". Another attempt was scheduled for the summer of the following year.
The Inuit told Peary that they themselves had made an attempt to carry away a section of the
"Woman" a couple of generations before Peary arrived at the scene. A portion of the upper body
of the woman had become detached because of the constant chiseling away of fragments over the
centuries. When the head came off, a party of Inuit from Peterahwik
lashed it to a sledge to carry it away in order to have
a more convenient supply of the precious metal and to save themselves the long and arduous journey
to Cape York and into Melville bay. "When well out from the shore the sea
ice suddenly broke up with a loud noise, and the head disappeared beneath the water, dragging
down with it the sledge and dogs. The Eskimos themselves narrowly escaped
with their lives and since then no attempt has been made to carry away any
but the smallest fragments of the heavenly woman".
In late August 1895 "woman" and "Dog" were transported to the shore and secured to
Peary's ship "Kite". These were the first of the Greenland meteorites to arrive in the US.
In 1896 after Peary had chartered a larger ship suitable for the huge load Ahnighito was
excavated in a ten day effort with a full village of Eskimos hired as workmen.
Then a "road" was cleared and the massive meteorite was hauled down
to the shore in an act of unprecedented endeavor. However
as a civil engineer Peary was well prepared for the tremendous task. With hydraulic jacks,
the largest ones Peary was able to obtain, the meteorite was lifted from its
bed: "... and as it rose slowly inch by inch
under the resistless lift of the hydraulic jacks, gradually displaying
its ponderous sides, it grew
upon us as Niagara grows upon the observer, and there was not one of us unimpressed by the
enormousness of this lump of metal."
It was not before 1897 that work was completed and Ahnighito was embarked on
the Hope in last six day effort. Before Peary ends
his account with a description of the recovered masses and letters of Weinschenk and
Brezina confirming that
the samples indeed represent an iron meteorite, Peary acknowledges the "invaluable assistance"
of his "faithful little band of Eskimos", who "did all they could to put into my possession
the Iron Mountain of their forefathers."
Inventory # C-065
Ueber den Tauschwerth der Meteoriten
Von E. A. Wuelfing, Separat-Abdruck aus dem Neuen Jahrbuch Für Mineralogie und Palaeonthologie,
Jg. 1899. Bd 1. S. 115-118. Stuttgart 1899
Wuelfing's brief paper "On the trade value of meteorites" can be considered as one of
the primary sources of information on the 19th century conditions of the inter-institutional meteorite trades.
By naming eight factors determining the value of a meteorite such as total weight of the class,
known number of owners, costs of recovery, probability of future falls of the respective class,
individual weight and character, Wuelfing deduces a complex formula to calculate the individual
value of a given meteorite.
As so often the icing on the cake in scientific treatises comes from the footnotes. There
Wuelfing admits
that some curators seem to have had problems implementing his sophisticated value calculation
in their trades with dealers. On page 116 he quotes an English
correspondant to Nature: "As regards the pecuniary values to be assigned to the meteorites,
we are afraid that the dealers will eschew all such mathematical calculations as are suggested
by the author, and will in each case get, as heretofore, what they can".
We also owe Wuelfing the documentation of a debate on a trade between a 19th century
collector and the curator of an institutional collection (image above).
The collector offered a 268g plate of Vaca Muerte and the institutional curator
sent him a list of meteorites (top table) which the collector thought would
undervalue his offer. To proove his point he responded with another list that listed
meteorites he had received from a different institutional collection and which he had traded for
a 171g plate
of Vaca Muerte (bottom table). Unfortunately Wuelfing
does not report how the dispute ended.
click to continue
go to page
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
historic sources for sale
|
|

|
© 2001-2008 NigerMeteoriteRecon
|
|