
|
|
|
|
Click here to view the "Meteorite Article Archive".
Desert meteorites in situ
Part 2 Breakup through weathering
|

|
Remains of a ~1 kg chondrite. The meteorite's fragmentation is
caused by surface weathering. Fragments are distributed over several meters. (meteorite under classification)
|
|
Breakup through weathering and horizontal movement
Meteorites exposed on desert surfaces for a very long time or during
more arid phases often break up along pre-existent cracks due to chemical and
mechanical weathering. This is particularly true for finds located in sandy
areas. The fragments of these meteorites are sometimes found distributed over
several meters with the smaller fragments often but not always transported further away
than the larger fragments. At first sight there is no obvious reason for this strange
phenomenon, particularly if the find location is situated on an even surface with
no hydraulic gradient.
Visualizing the soil erosion process in the vertical dimension
provides the answer. While breaking apart on a deflation surface
over the millennia, soil is constantly removed under the meteorite
and its fragments. This results in a vertical downward movement of
the meteorite and its fragments. Variations in the soil composition,
roots and camel grass tussocks affect the macro-local surface resilience
towards erosion and deflect the downwards movement of meteorite fragments
over the time.
|

|
Larger meteorite fragments located on a slight gravel slope. Note the lower fragment (550 g) which has already
moved 40 cm downwards and which is in the process of further fragmentation. (meteorite under classification)
|
|
Thus during the erosion and deflation process temporarily
local gradients, small channels and grooves can occur which further
contribute to a horizontal movement of surface rocks - particularly
during the periods with frequent rainfalls. Because the final surface,
in many cases a perfectly even gravel pavement or sand plane, no
longer shows any evidence of these processes,
the migrating meteorites are often the only telltale signs that these
surfaces in fact transform over the millennia.
Corrasion
Another interesting feature visible on meteorites
found on desert surfaces is corrasion (not to be confused with "corrosion").
The term describes the wearing away of the meteorite's surface by natural sandblasting.
Usually corrasion is found only on the windward surface of the meteorite and is mostly
limited to an area not exceeding 3-4 centimeters from ground. The limitation to the
windward side is an indication for a steady wind direction over the complete period
of the meteorite's surface exposure.
|

|
1/200sec exposure image showing wind borne sand abrading a meteorite. Most of the
activity takes place in the space up to three centimters from the surface (Rub al-Chali, meteorite
under classification, specimen 6 cm longest dimension)
|
|
In the Sahara and in most parts of the Rub al Khali only
the the east- or northeastern surfaces of meteorite's display
the effects of corrasion. In case a meteorite is exposed for a
long time and/or composed of a relatively soft lithology then
the windborne sand can literally
carve tunnels and deep regmaglypt like cavities into the rock.
|

|
Ink black meteorite weighing 590 g on a bright gravel surface. (meteorite under classification, scale cube is 1 cm)
|
|
Detectability
One would think that a fusion crusted or desert patina
coated meteorite is easy to spot on a bright gravel surface
over a great distance. Unfortunately this isn't the case.
The advantage of a good background contrast is lost as soon as the sun
is not in the ideal six o'clock position of the viewer.
Rocks, pebbles and roots in the nearer surrounding cast shadows as black as
the meteorite in their middle causing a plethora of potential targets that all have to be ckecked.
A meteorite the size of a golf ball will blur with the
surrounding in broad midday light if more than a couple of
paces away from the viewer. In fact we have spotted no
meteorite this size any further than from a distance of
five or six meters.
On anything smaller you have to step on
in order to find it, even in ideal light conditions.
In situ photos showing an ink black stone on a plain
white surface often give a wrong impression in this regard.
The striking contrast is often put into perspective if one
steps back and pictures the meteorite in its wider surrounding.
Most desert surfaces show a wide variety of look-alikes and
pseudo-meteorites littering one's search area.
|

|
The same meteorite as in the previous image, this time photographed from a distance of seven meters. Numerous
black spots can be seen in the surrounding, all are terrestrial rocks.
|
|
A meteorite
will look no different to these dark rocks from a certain
distance. Not unless the keen prospector picked up a couple
of hundred of these and intimately internalized their
appearances from a thousand angles during every altitude
of the sun and on every surface background imaginable.
Only then he might notice the
insignificant difference in an outline or the slight shade of
tint that separates the genuine meteorite from its terrestrial
Doppelganger.
Return to part 1, Shielding from weathering
Part 1 Shielding from weathering
Part 2 Breakup through weathering
Return to the "Meteorite Article Archive".
|
© 2001-2010 NigerMeteoriteRecon
|
|