Fragmented surfaces that were not subjected to atmospheric Ablation, often display distinct shock veining, minor brecciation and planar fractures. Single cm-sized impact melt pockets are common and also occur as individual meteorite fragments. The abundant shock planes along which the meteorite broke apart in the atmosphere often show slickensides. Some fragments display shock planes as complete surfaces.
Black shock veins intersecting the fractured surface of a 122 g Chelyabinsk fragment. Note the dark melt pocket in the upper left
13.9 g Chelyabinsk individual consisting completely of impact melt (left: natural surface, right: cut surface)
Shock plane with slickensides visible on the fractured surface of 277 g Chelyabinsk individual
Pieces of the Chelyabinsk meteorite were traded and sold as early as February 15, the day of the fall. On February 16, the first specimens appeared on the Russian internet portal avito.ru and were sold to various buyers, both in Russia and internationally. On February 18, Russian media websites reported that the trade of fragments from the meteorite was considered illegal by scientists, and as a consequence, meteorites found in private possession would be confiscated. This in turn was denied by Russian law firms and attorneys, who made clear that no current law existed that prohibited the possession and sale of meteorites in and out of Russia.
While it is true that the 1832 Code of Law of the former Russian Empire declared meteorites to be the property of the government, it is also true that the 1832 Code of Law was replaced for good reason after the Russian Revolution in 1917. Since 1996, the Civil Code of the Russian Federation has held precedence. It contains a paragraph on mining laws (that do in fact mention meteorites), but the mining laws are only adressing the status of resources under the soil, which means they can not be applied to objects on the surface. Instead, the relevant paragraph is § 2,129 Civil Code. It does not mention meteorites under the list of objects that automatically fall into the government’s possession. Thus, the attorney and Russian law expert Ruslan Koblev explained that a person finding a meteorite in Russia is free to do with it whatever they chose.
However, Russian scientists did not like the idea that private individuals keep or sell the meteorites they have found. The director of the Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Erik Galimov, told the newspaper Izvestiya that the removal of fragments of the meteorite would endanger the work of scientists. The member of the Duma Committee for Science and High Technology, Victor Grokhovsky, explains why: ‘If Western scientists were to publish an analysis of the Chelyabinsk meteorite prior to our own findings, it will affect the prestige of Russian science in general’, he told Izvestya.
On February 26, RIA Novosti reported that Russian scientists had appealed to the Federal Customs Service with the intent to stop fragments of the Chelyabinsk meteorite from being exported. However, there was yet no legal basis for an export prohibition of Chelyabinsk meteorites. As a consequence, the Russian Duma announced an initiative to ban meteorites from export that have fallen on Russian territory. The decision of the Duma’s Committee for Science and Technology on the matter was scheduled for announcement on March 6 or 7, but the date has elapsed without any decision becoming public. It remains to be seen if such a ban would be beneficial to the goals of the Academy of Sciences, given the many specimens that have already been traded prior to the new legislation.